Doubles with myself. First exposure in portugal with canon eos 5, second exposure in france with lomo lc-a+.

ช่างภาพ:
robertofiuza
อัพโหลดแล้ว:
2014-03-17
แท็ก:
diy double doubles exposure monochrome multiple mx rodinal splitzer swap
กล้อง:
Lomo LC-A+ (มีวางจำหน่ายในร้านออนไลน์ของเรา)
ฟิล์ม:
Protopan
เมือง:
Paris
ประเทศ/จังหวัด:
France
Year:
2014
อัลบั้ม:
Empty Heads (in Paris)

12 ความคิดเห็น

  1. fadjaradiputra
    fadjaradiputra ·

    Great doubles!

  2. 134340
    134340 ·

    great set

  3. fotohelmut
    fotohelmut ·

    A wonderful album!

  4. sandravo
    sandravo ·

    Gorgeous! I really want to now how this can be done so perfectly! Love it!

  5. robertofiuza
    robertofiuza ·

    @sandravo, just between the two of us, I have to admit that this is 10% skill and 90% luck! I get a few cool lomographs but it's still not exactly what i want to do and it's a slow learning process and I guess it's one of the reasons film photography is so fun :)

  6. sandravo
    sandravo ·

    You got that right, the fun is trying out new things ;-). Quetsion: did you shoot the kids in front a white sheet, window, light source...? And how did you expose? Both silhouette and background one step underexposed?

  7. robertofiuza
    robertofiuza ·

    @sandravo, I used to do it like I explained here:
    www.lomography.com/magazine/tipster/2014/02/04/couples-mx-s…
    but now I have two softboxes :) One is behind the person and the other is used to light the face but leave the hair in the shadow. To get the white background I set the lens to the maximum aperture - 2.8 - and overexpose by 1.5 or 2 stops (still working on this!) the first exposure. The second exposure is underexposed by one stop. In this case I had a 400 ISO film, I shot the children at 100 and for the second exposure I set the LC-A to ISO 800. I used the same camera orientation (portrait) for the first exposure and tried to split the frame in 2 halves (face/hair) and then in some of the second exposures I used a splitzer to cover the face half, that's why the face is not double exposed.

  8. sandravo
    sandravo ·

    I most definitely read that tipster, I simply forgot you were the smart one who wrote it! Very useful information, thanks for that. Now all I need is two soft boxes... ;-). I admire the fact you got very clean results, very white backgrounds, beautiful images... NOT using photoshop! :-)

  9. reverendsugare
    reverendsugare ·

    absolute fantastic! Never seen such great doubles....<3

  10. nudels
    nudels ·

    nice album!!

  11. letone
    letone ·

    esta série está top roberto! parabéns

  12. robertofiuza
    robertofiuza ·

    Obrigado @letone :)

More photos by robertofiuza