7 ความคิดเห็น

1. 
   frenchyfyl · 2017-06-24 16:05

   @ilcontrariodime, @vita-reducta, @mlchaelbexley, @oleg-f, @jamescat22, @mot11, @pinkbutterfly, @txr53, @umeshu, @metaluna, @theblues, @cedricpola, @guja, @bkspicture, @fragakis_p and @schwarzesauge THANKS FOR THE LIKES!

2. 
   xsara · 2017-06-25 01:57

   nice shot!

3. 
   frenchyfyl · 2017-06-25 07:49

   @xsara thanks!

4. 
   frenchyfyl · 2017-06-25 12:22

   Thanks for the likes! @ekeupratama, @ancalu, @johnee, @nudels, @juniardigiugno, @antmark, @paulus74, @soft-focus, @duque, @clickiemcpete, @holga69, @gesp, @jakkr, @oliv0380, @lomodesbro, @marcoyeti56, @josa, @cfehse, @yago56, @why-yu, @rik041 and @wildholzkamera

5. 
   renata_duan · 2017-09-04 06:40

   Hello FRENCHYFYL, I'm thinking about buying a sprocket rocket (mostly because of your amazing photos :P), but I don't know if the DigitaLISA Scanning Mask is indispensable for having those sprocket holes or not. Could you give me some advises about this, pls? Here is the product's link- shop.lomography.com/en/digitaliza-35mm-scanning-mask
   Thank you and sorry for bothering 😋

6. 
   frenchyfyl · 2017-09-04 10:29

   @renata_duan Thanks!
   All my Sprocket Rockets shots are processed and scanned by the lomolab. So, I don't know really if this Scanning Mask is indispensable. I think it's easier to scan with it, but not indispensable at all. You can directly scan the film (or the prints) without the mask.

7. 
   renata_duan · 2017-09-05 02:04

   @frenchyfyl Ok great, got it. Merci beaucoup! 😊😊